CO129-497 - Public Offices - 1926 — Page 291

:

285,

Com

one No. 1

Todos

A

It is

718

1

-WonÅDS OF Vraní vraðstong .TV vợ be Joer ib

*a? "to" æo¿{{11»\ò200.x tezdní tuor té žqlwów udi sybe I

du ngbut Imoqqa as galjoa vol (anexanol (95fJeut_1eldD

STGRADOTO si Ji onde andisasso no kadprisita

nonel-negasztro to vqca a niatyodmaɖɔ „A. TIJ, YTSJATOSU

bouọt naad saj 22 kmát zéérger vremÅ ‚TË

@bdź 03 jaİTYLOW VEHICİmilere yna Juodšie (YTELUSOSA

doide,stubnoorą wiinupoom.to abquory no dalloda of

•

-CYNETTA FLA Joužưo nät ja bijav yliaups Jduch on ezer ni bing, ennavolia sưp Sad) skär älskar nor do ždy drom

-AZ MOT) Meri mu b[uore gnojnoй to soltuut teldə ed‡

math Jend að aðsequat Ila ni Iaugs on bra

TOYUNÇLİ anaunang si

JSAJ

E

kadžuserių (sottuut teżɗɔ and yď

ITATE TO YHAT ROZE ROUND!

29 TEKO KU EMPOW

ht this stage it would serve no useful purpose to

this question.

It only remains therefore to invite attention

he considerations advanced in Sir E. Stubbs' confidential

•

ch of the 8th of August 1925 (a copy of which wan

sed in the letter from this Department of the 4th of

er 1923) which still hold good.

Mr. Amery notes that insir A. Chamberlain's opinion

alv alternative is one which would result in the payment come tax being devided equally between the Chief Justice

heChief Judge. This would appear to be the least un-

factory arrangement in the circumstances, since the

imposed by accounting considerations før which Kr.

is not responsible would thus be equally divided

ben the two officers concerned. While Mr. Anery has

ut that Sir H.Gollan, so far as personal grounds are

י-

med, would not wish to let any burden fall on Sir

her Turner, he is confident that the latter would be no

se reluctant to see Sir B. Gollan placed in a worse

sition than himself.

Mr. Amery kopes, therefore, that on reconsidera-

i Bir A. Chamberlain, unless he is prepared to take up

Etter again with the Treasury, will agree that the

west

287